Clark School Home UMD

ISR News Story

Shneiderman writes about future network collaboration research in Science magazine

Shneiderman's SocialAction analysis tool  shows collaboration between pairs of U.S. senators. The Democratic senators (blue) are at the left and Republican senators (red) at the right; Sanders and Lieberman (magenta) are independents. Shneiderman argues Science 2.0 must develop tools like this to analyze human relationships and collaborations. View a larger version of this diagram at HCIL's SocialAction web page.
Shneiderman's SocialAction analysis tool shows collaboration between pairs of U.S. senators. The Democratic senators (blue) are at the left and Republican senators (red) at the right; Sanders and Lieberman (magenta) are independents. Shneiderman argues Science 2.0 must develop tools like this to analyze human relationships and collaborations. View a larger version of this diagram at HCIL's SocialAction web page.

ISR-affiliated Professor Ben Shneiderman (CS) has written an opinion piece in Science magazine on the need for new tools to understand collaborative, socio-technical systems—and created one of his own.

Shneiderman is the founding director of the Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory, an ISR-affiliated lab. At HCIL he has created a new social network analysis tool, SocialAction, with Ph.D. student Adam Perer.

Shneiderman argues that "the growth of the World Wide Web and the spread of cell phones and WiFi continues to reorder whole disciplines and industries. Entrepreneurs, policy-makers, and researchers have recognized that increased collaboration through these socio-technical systems offers compelling opportunities for business, education, national security, and beyond. It is time for researchers in science to take network collaboration to the next phase and reap the potential intellectual and societal payoffs."

He writes that "successful scientific collaboratories among genomic researchers, engineering innovations through open-source software, and community-based participation in cultural heritage projects are all early indicators of the transformative nature of collaboration."

"Understanding these collaboration-centered socio-technical systems could accelerate their adoption and raise their benefits. However, researchers will need to develop new ways of studying these complex interactions. Science 1.0 will continue to be important, but new kinds of science, which I call Science 2.0, are needed to study the integrated interdisciplinary problems at the heart of socio-technical systems. Science 2.0 will be especially important to meet the design challenges in secure voting, global environmental protection, energy sustainability, and international development among many others."

Shneiderman's Science commentary has been picked up by various other news organizations. | Read the complete article at the Science web site. | Learn about the SocialAction tool at the HCIL web site. |

March 12, 2008


Prev   Next

 

 

Current Headlines

Nau, Gelfand, Goldstein part of MURI developing the potential of mean-field game theory

ECE Names 2017-2018 Distinguished Dissertation Fellows

UMD Celebrates Invention of Year Winners, Ventures, and Partnerships at 'Innovate Maryland'

Ulukus named Anthony Ephremides Professor in Information Sciences and Systems

Maryland researchers develop computational approach to understanding brain dynamics

Alumnus Raef Bassily joins Ohio State as tenure-track faculty

Maryland researchers awarded $1M DARPA Lagrange program cooperative agreement

Bill Regli featured at Global Industrial Cooperation Conference

Brin Family Prize to Support Excellence in Drone-Related Activity

Schizophrenia drug monitoring device research featured on IEEE Sensors Letters cover

News Resources

Return to Newsroom

Search News

Archived News

Events Resources

Events Calendar